Wednesday, November 23, 2011

What's going on in Colorado that affects charter schools

What's going on in Colorado that affects charter schools

As a charter school follower, you're probably interested when things happen that could affect charter schools. There are a number of things that have happened over the past few months that while not earth shattering could change the charter school landscape significantly. I'll just focus on three.

First, it looks as if legislation will require that charter school authorizers judget their charter schools according to a set or rubrics set up by the Charter School Support Initiative. (Note: I have served on a CSSI team.) The CSSI was originally set up as a move to support charter schools. This initiative focused on new schools who received the federal charter school start up grant. Usually in the second year of a school's operations, a team would spend two or three days reviewing the school's operations and evaluate the school and provide a report. This consulting effort was designed to assist the school in improving all aspects of its operations. It now appears that this list of best practices will be the law that charter schools must follow.

Second, Denise Mund has left her post as the leader of the Schools of Choice Unit at the Colorado Department of Education. Ms. Mund has been in that post for years and has led a successful effort in educating schools in order to make them more successful. Her efforts have led to meetings such as the Business Manager's Network Meeting (which I have been a part of). These meetings assist the business office of schools, providing education in a variety of topics from Human Resource legal issues to proper use of the state chart of accounts in accounting.

In some ways, this could be a good thing. Charter schools will have to assess itself and authorizers will insist that charter schools be judged according to best practices. On the other hand, it could be used as a stick that requires charter schools to adopt "best practices" even if the school has good reasons not to adopt those practices. In other words, best practices may become absolute standards. This is not a good thing. What works for some doesn't always work for others. In some cases the standards and adherence to the standards is subjective. In many cases, adherence to these standards will not dictate what is or is not a successful school. It is possible that if not implemented well, these standards could be used against schools rather than for them.

Third, Mark Hyatt will be leaving the Charter School Institute at the end of December. He is leaving shortly after the board's adoption of a new strategic plan. Hyatt's vacancy leaves an open question for schools currently authorized by the Institute as well as schools seeking to be authorized by the Institute. Will the process become more difficult? CSI has already told its schools that its role will be changing. It's not completely clear if those changes will benefit schools or not. It's quite possible that schools will incur additional costs if CSI reduces its services to schools. It also appears as if CSI will not approve any new schools for the 2012-13 school year. It's difficult to tell if that is due to CSI raising the bar or if this is a temporary measure due to the changes in strategic plan and the upcoming change in leadership. (Note: I formerly worked for Mark Hyatt and I am currently assisting a school that was seeking authorization through CSI for the 2012-13 school year.

These changes leave open questions about where Colorado charter schools stand and what changes they may have to make to their current way of operating. It also leaves questions for those who are considering opening under the banner of the CSI. It's difficult to say when the picture will become clearer, but it's clear that these changes will have an impact on all charter schools

School funding headed for collapse?

School funding headed for collapse?

Written by on Nov 16th, 2011. | Copyright © EdNewsColorado.org

Colorado’s school funding system could hit a constitutional dead end in less than five years, a veteran analyst told the Joint Budget Committee Wednesday.

Photo illustration of piggy bankA discussion of the tough prospects facing school funding was the centerpiece of Carolyn Kampman’s briefing to the committee on the proposed K-12 budget for the 2012-13 school year. She also updated the committee – and more than a dozen other lawmakers who sat in – on funding for online students and the status of the Lobato v. State school funding lawsuit.

Every fall committee staff analysts such as Kampman brief the panel on each state agency, reviewing current spending, policy issues and making initial spending recommendations for the upcoming budget year.

Wednesday’s K-12 funding briefing departed from the usual script in taking a longer-term view of the dilemma facing the state.

Kampman walked lawmakers through an explanation of the two constitutional requirements that drive school funding:

• Amendment 23 requires that base per-pupil funding increase annually by the rate of inflation.

• State school finance law, which is designed to implement the constitution’s “thorough and uniform” education requirement, allocates different per-pupil amounts to individual districts based on what are called the “factors.” The primary factors are cost of living for staff, district size and the percentage of at-risk students. The system is intended to provide a “thorough and uniform” education to students in districts where it may be more expensive to educate students than it is elsewhere.

The legislature, faced two years ago with having to balance the state budget while revenues were dropping, introduced a new element called the “negative factor” into the equation. It’s used to reduce the total amount determined by Amendment 23 and the other factors to a dollar amount for school funding needed to balance the state budget.

School funding chart

Starred line shows projected increase in per pupil base funding. Black portion indicates flat K- funding. Green area shows impact of fulling funding enrollment growth. Red area shows cost of fully covering inflation increases, White area shows cost of funding to full Amendment 23 levels. CLICK TO ENLARGE

What Kampman basically told lawmakers was that Amendment 23, school finance law and the negative factor are on a collision course that will make the whole system unconstitutional by 2015-16.

“If total program funding remains flat, the portion devoted to base per pupil funding will continue to crowd out the portion available to differentiate districts’ per pupil funding amounts. Absent a funding increase, there would be no funding available for differentiation by FY 2015-16 and funding would be insufficient to increase base per pupil funding as required by Amendment 23,” Kampman wrote in her briefing paper. (She used “differentiation” to refer to the factors.)

The briefing paper said that Gov. John Hickenlooper’s proposed 2012-13 cut of $88 million to current school funding of $5.2 billion would reduce the amount of money available for the factors to 7.5 percent of total spending. Kampman said that would accelerate the trend she’s warning about.

She recommended that the JBC work with legislative leaders, the House and Senate education committees and the governor’s office to discuss a school funding amount for 2012-13. Also recommended was discussion of whether new laws, constitutional changes and/or additional funding are needed “to ensure that the General Assembly can continue to comply with the constitutional mandate to provide for the maintenance of a thorough and uniform public school system,” in the words of the briefing paper.

School finance snapshots

  • Current total program funding – $5.2 billion
  • Average per-pupil funding – $6,468
  • Funded enrollment – 805,891
  • Governor’s proposed 2012-13 cut – 1.7 percent
  • Cut in per-pupil funding – $162
  • Historic school funding high was $5.6 million in 2009-10 for 789,497 students

“I think this is one of the most important issues we’re going to be dealing with,” said Rep. Cheri Gerou, R-Evergreen. She said she’d work to set up a meeting of the JBC and the two education committees as early as possible in the 2012 legislative session, which kicks off Jan. 11. The two committee chairs, Rep. Tom Massey, R-Poncha Springs, and Sen. Bob Bacon, D-Fort Collins, sat through Wednesday’s briefing.

Gerou, noting other pressures on the state budget like steeply rising Medicaid costs, quipped, “This is why I wake up at night screaming.”

Rep. Mark Ferrandino, D-Denver and a JBC member, said K-12 and Medicaid funding make it “conceivable that we could not fund higher education at all.”

Sen. Pat Steadman, D-Denver and also a committee member, commented, “We just keep digging a deeper hole in the school finance act.”

Funding for online schools

The briefing paper also included a section about online schools, an issue of increasing concern and a problem examined in a recent investigation by Education News Colorado and the Rocky Mountain Investigative News Network (read stories here).

The Legislative Audit Committee recently deadlocked on a request by Senate President Brandon Shaffer, D-Longmont, for a state audit of online schools (see story).

Kampman recommended lawmakers take a look at online education because of budgetary implications. Her briefing paper noted “existing systems for funding students and holding school districts accountable have proven to be an awkward fit as on-line learning has developed and expanded in Colorado.”

Briefing paper

  • Discussion of school finance dilemma starts on page 15
  • Online education section begins on page 33

Her recommendation is that “the General Assembly continues to evaluate whether the existing framework for funding and evaluating on-line programs can and should be improved. Staff recommends further study and consideration of policy issues related to per-pupil funding levels and counting methods for on-line programs, limiting the amount of per-pupil funding that may be retained by an authorizer, and ensuring that financial reporting requirements are consistent and transparent.”

Among the key questions around online programs are high attrition rates rates of students and lagging achievement levels.

Some of the lawmakers at Wednesday’s hearing raised questions about the real meaning of attrition rates, suggesting deeper analysis of that problem is needed.

What’s next

The JBC will be briefed Dec. 1 on other parts of CDE’s budget, including the department’s request for $25.9 million in startup funds for a new testing system. Hickenlooper has recommended that money not be included in the 2012-13 budget, but CDE hopes to persuade lawmakers otherwise.

Department executives will have a chance at a Dec. 16 hearing to make their spending case and to answer questions raised at the two briefings.

SEE THE ARTICLE HERE: http://www.ednewscolorado.org/2011/11/16/28747-school-funding-headed-for-collapse


Monday, November 21, 2011

Kick Open Your Classroom Doors

***In an effort to share thoughts, resources and reflections concerning best-practices in public education, please consider the following article forwarded by AHS Faculty Member, Cathy Eagen. Interesting to note how many of these suggestions and ideas are in play at AHS on a daily basis. Enjoy! ***

Teachers of the Year: Kick Open Your Classroom Doors

The Council of Chief State School Officers and the Center for Teaching Quality have developed an online community for past and present state Teachers of the Year. These accomplished teachers recently took part in a three-day intensive discussion about the public perception of the teaching profession. The discussion, summarized here, took place on the NTOY Network, an online community of theTeacher Leaders Network.

How much do Americans really know about the quality of teaching in our schools? And is what they "know" based on evidence—or on the most recent sensationalistic headline on the national news?

In a recent PDK/Gallup poll, 79 percent of parents gave their child's school a grade of A or B. When all adults' responses are considered (parents and non-parents), only 51 percent would give local schools an A or B. And when all adults are asked to grade the nation's schools, only 17 percent would assign them an A or B.

Obviously, local pride plays a role—but does that fully explain the discrepancy in how the public gauges schools? We believe that evidence—research and data about teaching and learning—can make a difference. Parents have limited evidence to draw upon: what their own children say about the school day, for instance. But the general public has even less solid evidence. This opacity comes at a cost: the public perception of the teaching profession can be easily swayed by rhetoric, propaganda, or media coverage that is not evidence-based.

What can we teachers do about it?

Teach.Great teachers don't just present information to students. We encourage inquiry. Our students are active in their own learning—exploring, analyzing, and evaluating evidence in order to reach tentative conclusions. They re-evaluate these conclusions as they learn and as new evidence comes to light.

We must bring our teaching skills to our work with the community. In other words, on top of our other responsibilities as teachers, we must become public engagement experts, advocating for our schools, students, and profession. Rather than talking "at" the public, we must actively involve community members in honest discussions, explore the evidence with them, and let them help shape the educational landscape as partners.

Open our classroom doors.Web 2.0 tools equip us to share evidence of excellent teaching with community members. Through social media sites, blogs, and class websites, we can let the public know exactly what is happening behind our classroom doors. Classroom video feeds or student-produced documentaries can bring the magic of learning alive. And by responding to comments and messages, we can enhance the transparency of our work and begin authentic discussions.

But to "open our classroom doors" isn't just a metaphor. Face-to-face interactions represent the foundation of the teacher-community relationship. We can think beyond our school campus: involving students in service-learning projects, developing partnerships with local non-profits, and welcoming community members to take part in cultural events. We can host discussions that underscore our role as leaders and invite honest dialogue about teaching and learning.

And of course, we must reach out to our students' families. Schools should be inviting places where all families feel comfortable and welcome. This requires us to consider the messages we transmit each day (often unintentionally). Are we assigning homework that is relevant and valuable? Do our print materials advance a healthy culture of teaching and learning? How about the tone of our emails and grading comments? Every interaction with students and families "counts" toward their opinion of our hard work and professionalism.

Help reporters to identify great stories—and why these stories are significant.We must partner with reporters to help us effectively "teach" a larger audience. Strategic small steps can help us build these relationships. We can send a quick email when a reporter highlights our profession in a productive way. We can offer ourselves as interviewees on particular topics and connect reporters with other accomplished teachers. We can help the media identify the stories that most need to be told.

As Dan Lortie pointed out many years ago in Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study (1975), we teachers have long been accustomed to an egalitarian culture in our profession where no one teacher stands out too much. For this reason, we rarely highlight what our most effective colleagues are doing in the classroom—and we certainly don't want to appear to brag about our own efforts.

It's time to get over that. We should have local reporters' numbers on speed dial to let them know when great things are happening in our schools. Our news need not be earth-shattering: we could talk about an engaging class project, an innovative way to measure student learning, a student club's service-learning efforts, or the individual stories of teachers and students. Before we pick up the phone or fire off an email, we should think about how to frame our good news, explaining why it matters in a local and national context.

Sometimes our work with the media can include honesty about how and why we struggle. If we plan for these conversations, we can expose systemic problems while keeping our comments focused on solutions and what's most important: student learning.

Advocate for improved accountability systems.The taxpaying public has a right to hold us accountable for our work.

It is time for us, as educators, to accept a grave responsibility: holding one another accountable in ways that are far more accurate, valid and fair than the use of standardized test scores as the centerpiece of most accountability systems. Why? Because accomplished teachers know students, content, and teaching methods better than anyone. Because, regardless of their field, professionals strive to improve the outcomes for those they serve. And because we can help to ensure that teacher evaluation is adequately supported by research, based on best practices, and grounded in classroom realities.

Of course, many of us are already doing this now, in our own schools and professional learning communities. We are collecting and sharing data about student learning and analyzing that data for ways to improve our effectiveness. We are assembling portfolios of student work. We are inviting our peers to observe and critique our instruction. We are assessing students throughout the year with performance-based tasks.

But to intervene in the national dialogue about teaching, we must advocate for major changes in education policy—and in the cultures of our schools. Truly holding one another accountable will require extra time, a new level of trust, and some difficult discussions. It will also require major changes in the way our schools are structured and how we view our professional responsibilities and culture.

Imagine what would be possible if expert teachers could hold hybrid roles, teaching students for part of the day and working to improve teaching and learning for the remainder. They might gather and analyze data, evaluate peers' instruction, or lead data-driven professional development. They might even be tasked with engaging the public, reaching out to communities (or states, or the nation) with direct evidence of what is working well—and not so well—for our students.

Such a shift toward transparency and high-quality data could catalyze dramatic changes in the national perception of teachers. If America's 3.2 million public school teachers begin to take hold of our profession, we can engage others—students, parents, the media, and other community members—in advocating for the public schools our student deserve.

The stakes are high. Ultimately, student learning and the teaching profession hang in the balance. We hope you—our fellow teachers—are willing to take on the tough tasks. To build relationships with community members and the media. To tell engaging stories and explain why they matter. To gather and share evidence of the work you do, and advocate for changes to transform your (our!) profession. These tasks define the profession of teaching, so in other words, we hope that you teach. Kick open your classroom doors and teach.

Premium article access courtesy of TeacherMagazine.org.


Tuesday, November 15, 2011

AHS Weekly Update- Week of November 14th, 2011

Thanksgiving Vacation Week

AHS in the News

LINK- Power Lunch

Winter Sports at DHS

2nd Annual AHS Blood Drive

AHS Exchange Student Needs Host Family

AHS Online



Thanksgiving Vacation Week

A reminder that AHS will close this Friday, Nov. 18th at 3:30 PM for the start of Thanksgiving Vacation. Campus will re-open on Monday, Nov. 28th at 7 AM. Have a safe and restful break!

AHS in the News

Did you see this fantastic write up by Ann Butler in the Durango Herald?

http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20111112/COLUMNISTS03/711129978/Kids-inspired-to-reach-for-stars

LINK- Power Lunch

AHS Power Lunch will be held Tuesday Nov. 15th at 11:30 AM in the Physics Room. Martie Woodford, GIS Specialist, will present "Mapping with Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing." Light refreshments will be provided. Thanks for encouraging interested students to attend!

Winter Sports at DHS

On Wednesday, November 16th, there will be a mandatory meeting for all winter athletes, parents, and coaches in the main gym. The general session will begin at 7:00 p.m. and the specific sports sessions will begin at 7:30 p.m. in the following locations: Boys Basketball - Gym 1, Girls Basketball - Gym 2, Wrestling - Wrestling Room and Girls Swimming in the Cafeteria.

If you attended the Fall Sports Meeting you DO NOT have to attend the General Session, but MUST attend the specific sport session beginning at 7:30 p.m. in the above locations.

2nd Annual AHS Blood Drive

On Thursday, Dec. 8th, 2011 from 1:30 to 5 PM, Animas High School is will host our second annual blood drive. In order to donate blood, studentsmust be at least 16 yrs. old and weigh at least 110 lbs. Any student under 18 who plans on donating must complete a signed permission slip. Information, permission slips and questions should be forwarded to AHS Blood Drive Student Coordinator, Isabelle Tonso at ahsblooddrive@yahoo.com or contact the school at 247-2474

AHS Exchange Student Needs Host Family

We are looking for a host family for a 17 yr old Japanese boy who is currently attending Animas High. He is a great kid but because of a family situation with his current host family he needs a new home. He is very polite and is doing great! A little about this student:

Tatsuya is a 17 yr old Japanese boy who likes art, chess, FISHING, MOVIES, museums, PETS, playing indoor games/cards, reading, SPORTING EVENTS, television/videos. TRAVEL, and video games. He plays the recorder. He likes BADMINTON, BASEBALL, bowling, American football, GOLF, handball, SOCCER, SWIMMING, table tennis,tennis and track. He would like to play baseball and is interested in studying for school. HE likes children. He has been to Russia and Washington State for a month long summer home stay.

If you would like to help Tatsuya have an enjoyable homestay and

high school experience while he is here or if you have questions about

hosting please contact Sharon Elggren (piexchange@msn.com -

1-801-540-1402) or Lisa Kent (p.i.e._llk@q.com - 1-435-744-5182).

AHS Online

Are you following all the action online? If not, you’re missing out!

www.animashighschool.blogspot.com

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Animas-High-School/129694133734262

9th Grade DPs- http://faculty.animashighschool.com/~rmcknight/Mastered/2011%202012%20Freshmen.html

10th Grade DPs-

http://faculty.animashighschool.com/~rmcknight/NewHorizon1-0/digitalportfolios.html

11th Grade DPs-

http://faculty.animashighschool.com/~rmcknight/purpleseries/purpleseries/digitalportfolios10th.html




Animas High School Values:
  • Rigorous academics, where all students are prepared for college success
  • Culture of excellence, where students are held to high expectations
  • Strong faculty-student relationships, where students are well known
  • Engaging learning, where students see the relevance of their education